Thanks for the note.
I like the date you have chosen. It implies honesty and liberty.
chmod 777 chrisnphaedra.sh
-Jared
On Thursday 22 February 2007 11:43, Jared wrote:
I like the date you have chosen. It implies honesty and liberty.
chmod 777 chrisnphaedra.sh
Taken that way, it also implies insecurity, unfaithfulness, and temporary. Good thing 2007-07-07 is a mixed base date, and not octal UNIX permissions. ;)
On 2/22/07, Luke -Jr luke@dashjr.org wrote:
chmod 777 chrisnphaedra.sh
Taken that way, it also implies insecurity, unfaithfulness, and temporary. Good thing 2007-07-07 is a mixed base date, and not octal UNIX permissions. ;)
Assuming that one can gain access to the hardware
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:36, David Nicol wrote:
On 2/22/07, Luke -Jr luke@dashjr.org wrote:
chmod 777 chrisnphaedra.sh
Taken that way, it also implies insecurity, unfaithfulness, and temporary. Good thing 2007-07-07 is a mixed base date, and not octal UNIX permissions. ;)
Assuming that one can gain access to the hardware
No, that would be 0000. 0777 gives everyone access, local or remote.
On 2/22/07, Luke -Jr luke@dashjr.org wrote:
No, that would be 0000. 0777 gives everyone access, local or remote.
No. permissions are permissions. Access is access. To make a real-world analogy, I may have permission to run around naked in Antarctica, but there's no way I can do it unless I can get there somehow. Or to shout "theater" in a crowded firehouse.
-- institute U.N. sanctions against countries perpetrating false-flag operations!
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:46, David Nicol wrote:
On 2/22/07, Luke -Jr luke@dashjr.org wrote:
No, that would be 0000. 0777 gives everyone access, local or remote.
No. permissions are permissions. Access is access. To make a real-world analogy, I may have permission to run around naked in Antarctica, but there's no way I can do it unless I can get there somehow. Or to shout "theater" in a crowded firehouse.
Access is not local only. Virtually every system has a SSH daemon running. Analogous, "access to the hardware" would simply be being in the presense of the other person.
On Thursday 22 February 2007 12:46, David Nicol wrote:
On 2/22/07, Luke -Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
No, that would be 0000. 0777 gives everyone access, local or remote.
No. permissions are permissions. Access is access. To make a real-world analogy, I may have permission to run around naked in Antarctica, but there's no way I can do it unless I can get there somehow. Or to shout "theater" in a crowded firehouse.
Access is not local only. Virtually every system has a SSH daemon running. Analogous, "access to the hardware" would simply be being in the presense of the other person.
David is correct. Access is access. Adding a SSH daemon does not change the matter. The original chmod 777 was to a shell script, not a port.
It is assumed that ordinary directory and account security is in place.
Simply being in the presence of a person does not immediately evoke "I do." There is a little protocol, handshaking, etc, necessary before you get to that point. Eh.
-Jared
-
David Nicol -
Jared -
Luke -Jr