I have to agree with and acknowledge the other replies. To solve a mgmt issue with a technical solution doesn't always fly.
Given that the Domain Admin could reset the user's password and log onto the account, you may need to break away from his area of control - AD share technology. You may have to set up a SSL webdav server, sftp, nfs share, etc only the power user can have r/w access to.
One of the easiest solutions would be webdav, using LAMP stack on an SELinux enabled host. * Windows has built-in webdav mounting * The webserver could use AD/LDAP auth'ing or other ACL for just r/o access, while giving rights in a /etc/httpd/conf.d/custom-webdav.conf to a specific user name. - NOTE: if you use MS's AD/LDAP there's some funny business surrounding it. read up on it.
You could set up a Windows Host with standard file sharing or the webdav setup that's not managed by the AD Domain. Then you could use a Windows Filesharing, IIS or XAMPP solution.
No matter what poison pill you choose, you're still going to have the issue of backups, access to those backups, etc. :-)
Later, M. --- Mark A. Stinson
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:00 PM, kclug-request@kclug.org wrote:
Send KCLUG mailing list submissions to kclug@kclug.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to kclug-request@kclug.org
You can reach the person managing the list at kclug-owner@kclug.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of KCLUG digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Interesting challenge (for me at least) (Haworth, Michael A.)
Message: 1 Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:16:40 -0600 From: "Haworth, Michael A." Michael_Haworth@pas-technologies.com To: "KCLUG (E-mail)" kclug@kclug.org Subject: Interesting challenge (for me at least) Message-ID: 0446F51E8649E844BD140D357024A9A30B1E502842@SAL9000.PASTECH.PRV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
This is most likely pretty elementary, but I wanted to bounce it off of some people that know more than me and can point out any flaws in my very weary logic before I do a concept presentation to my bosses:
I have a folder that has to be available on the network (currently Windows with AD), but must be protected from unauthorized access (including access by Domain Admins). Here is what I think a valid solution could be:
Build up a CentOS box.
Install and configure SAMBA to allow for sharing to windows computers.
Create a SAMBA share for the required folder (and sort out auto-mount in case of a reboot).
create two accounts - one to allow for Read/Write access to the shared folder and one to allow for Read-only access
Issue the account credentials to the manager of the folder (in this case, out Export Compliance Officer) and then allow it to be that persons problem to manage who knows the credentials.
I see this as a low stress, low cost, quick, and above all - easy - way to deal with a potential compliance issue. The reason that we can not simply use Active Directory to restrict access is that one of our Domain Admins is a foreign national - if we were to place a 'deny access' on the folder, he could remove it if he wished - and getting rid of AD or Windows is not an option ATM, but it is still in process.
Any help from the list is greatly appreciated, Michael Haworthmailto:michael_haworth@pas-technologies.com Enterprise Systems Support Manager PAS Technologies Inc. D: (816) 556-5157 M: (816) 585-1033 F: (816) 556-5189
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
On Thursday 25 February 2010 05:33:20 pm Mark Stinson wrote:
I have to agree with and acknowledge the other replies. To solve a mgmt issue with a technical solution doesn't always fly.
Wow, you guys never have to deal with Regulatory issues, do you?
A logical, sensible, practical answer isn't what's called for - the answer must be compliant. Period. Otherwise, you stop doing business. Period.