Well SA 2.2 is catching about 155 of my spam. I may add some customization to see if I can't improve it a bit. I'll wait a bit before upgrading. I'd really like to block it up front.
-----Original Message----- From: D. Joe Anderson [mailto:kclug@etrumeus.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 12:54 PM To: KCLUG Subject: Re: spamassassin question [with blacklist question]
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:54:17PM -0500, Brian Kelsay wrote:
Brian, since this is a Debian system, why not use
apt-pinning for Spam
Assassin to get the version from testing? What does Spam Assassin depend on? If it doesn't need the latest and greatest of a
bunch of
pkgs., then you shouldn't have much problem. e.g. if it depends on Python, but doesn't need the latest. http://www.agnula.org/download/demudi/apt_pinning/view http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
Or, for that matter, if it can use i386 packages, why not pull a newer spamassassin out of http://www.backports.org?
-- Joe
Kclug mailing list Kclug@kclug.org http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
On Tuesday 26 October 2004 01:33 pm, Brian Densmore wrote:
Well SA 2.2 is catching about 155 of my spam. I may add some customization to see if I can't improve it a bit. I'll wait a bit before upgrading. I'd really like to block it up front.
I'd go with the upgrades before I worked on customizations. They've been very reliable for me.
-
Brian Densmore -
Jonathan Hutchins