On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Monty J. Harder mjharder@gmail.com wrote:
Don't put words in my mouth. I meant precisely what I said. The attitude you describe is indeed common, but it also short-sighted. Big businesses tend to be publicly-traded corporations, which are notorious for decisions that improve the current quarter's numbers at the expense of long-term health, to impress The Street (US) or The City (UK). Smaller, closely-held firms are more likely to see the cost of providing downloadable drivers for 10-year-old operating systems as an investment in that reputation for products that retain their value for many years, which allows them to charge more and thereby make a larger profit.
Well, I don't think you've read what I've written, then. You seem to think that I'm taking the position that they are doing a good thing, or that I agree with it. I honestly don't really care, as I don't buy shitty printers that don't speak PCL or PostScript. The printers I use can use generic drivers.
My position is that it's _how things are_. That's not "short-sighted", as I'm not taking a positive position on it. I'm not saying that I like what they're doing. I'm saying that those of you crying on and on about it are wasting your time, especially considering the fact that the main things impacted are winprinters, and anyone who bought one of those ought to not be mad about drivers - they ought to be mad that they were dumb enough (or deceived into) buying a lobotomized product. That's a separate issue.
For jeebus' sake, this is a LINUX list. Why are folks complaining about Windows stuff? Or is it just about complaining for complaining's sake nowadays? If you don't like what HP has done don't buy their products. Good luck finding a company that "cares" though. As for me, I'll happily buy their products if their hardware is good and the price is right, as I don't care about their software.
I guess I'm just "short-sighted" like that.
Jeffrey.