I second Bill's post idea's.
You know, I think of kclug as being a open, friendly lug. But this kind of bullshit makes me crindge.
Sorry for my spelling errors, my misplaced reply lines, and all the other shit that offends all.
I respect almost all of you a great deal, when I need help with something I know there is someone here who has the experience and knowledge to help me. I don't know all the net<wtf> however I would hope those complaining the most had common sense enough to follow conversations they are taking part of regardless of where reply's are made.
Not every joe blow knows all *** number of RFC's out there on the planet, if we can't be open, understanding, and helpful then what the fuck are we even in existance for?
Sorry if you can't read this cause it's a top quote... cant figure out what it's about? have a retarded 8 yearold help you read. (no offence to the educationally challenged).
I'll continue to post however i logically see fit.
"hmmm, no top posting, not-check; trimmed lines, not-check; trimmed replied-to message, not-check; nope, this post is not within the guidelines. ban me."
parts taken from Leo Mauler, edited by Tom bruno original quote in, Re: posting rules reminder by Leo mauler, 11/20/2005 3:18pm
"I don't care one way or the other, I certainly don't feel like I'm above anyone else on the list, so why should I or anyone else try to force views....." Bill Cavalieri
Jason Dewayne Clinton wrote:
On Sunday 20 November 2005 22:16, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
Why not just setup a poll on kclug.org http://kclug.org to settle all this?
Because there is no leader. There is no legal organization. There's no method of applying pressure to anyone. We cannot remove people from a group with no membership criteria. We have no rules. No one will abide by the results of such a poll. It's easier to be lazy than it is to be polite.
What we DO have are a bunch of people whom never learned netiquite posting to our list representing our group with their sloppy, illegible emails showing up in our archives in Google search results.
But then again, who is this "us" anyways?