On 10/18/06, Jason D. Clinton me@jasonclinton.com wrote:
We are studying B+ trees in CS352 and that has caused me to think about the design of some of the file systems in Linux. I have been faithfully served by ext3 for quite some time but am interested in the additional performance and features offered by some alternatives.
I ran ReiserFSv3 on several servers in the past and was bitten by a number of corner case bugs introduced by (pre-Novell) SuSE. ReiserFSv4 is still considered experimental by its team.
XFS has gained recent notoriety for losing the data of some prominent Linux figures. I remember that in the past few months, at least five people on various Planet aggregations said that XFS lost their entire partition and the recovery tools did not work.
So, having heard very little about JFS, I'm interested in knowing if anyone here has been running it and has any experiences to share.
-- Jason D. Clinton Something clever goes on this line.
The Mac HFS file system is B-Tree based. It was notorious for losing file info. Pre-OS X users swore by Norton Utils and others. Since OS X and the Journalled HFS+ and the option of UFS lots of these problems have gone away/changed. Now, Norton is "bad" for OS X and most people seem to rely on fsck.