Sacrificial Linux boxes

[Tom Bruno]

I personally don't find running kernel 2.6 to be "sacrificial".  I find 
it quite a bit nicer than 2.4. Especially on multi-cpu machines.

Jack wrote:

>It's awfully quiet out there. Is the list still up?
>Am I still subscribed?
>
>Well, let's find out. Is anyone running a sacrificial
>Linux box for testing such things as kernel patches,
>contributions or drivers? I'm going to set one up for
>a 2.6 debian box, so I can follow along with this book
>on Linux device drivers. So I'm looking for some ideas
>for what to load into this box on a hardware level and
>ask anyone if they have a particular device that needs
>to be written for or improved on. My budget is limited
>as I am still doing the Mr. Mom bit.
>
>
>Brian D.
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
>http://mail.yahoo.com 
>_______________________________________________
>Kclug mailing list
>Kclug at kclug.org
>http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>  
>