Win XP and repartitioning

[Jonathan Hutchins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com]

> I would recommend ME over any other version of Win9x (it has all the
> patches, and is the most stable of the breed). Win2000 is the most
> stable Winblows version available. 

To be marginally polite, balderdash.

All of the bloat and none of the stability is what I read in every review
that isn't a glossed Press Release.  Absolute crap according to every
reliable reviewer out there.  Reeking horsedung according to every tech
who's had to install it.

What's wrong with 95 anyway?  It's stable, it works, you can patch it to run
most hardware.  Any of the "features" that the later versions offer can be
had with third-party freeware.  As modern GUIs go, it's light weight and
efficient.  Who could ask for anything more?