Kepten! Veer Bean Skend!

[Tony Hammitt]

Did you append:

ether=10,0x300,eth0 ether=3,0x280,eth1

to your kernel boot line?

Is your BIOS aware that it is supposed to reserve IRQ's 3 and 10 for
ISA or, if the cards are PCI, that it is supposed to allow them to use
the IRQ's?  (That's what got me for a while).

I'll certainly be at the installfest.  Which symbol problems from dhcpd?
Do you mean dhcpcd?

Just think everybody:  Today is the day Tom gets home and checks his
email =-]  To find that he got booted from the list...  And has hundreds
of messages to himself...  Revenge!

Regards,

Tony

Jeff McCright wrote:
> 
> I am attempting to run it, but it only sees one of my
> SMC 8216T nics(I have two) which are set with the
> following config:
> Eth0
> Base I/O 300
> IRQ 10
> MEM CC00
> 
> What is supposed to be ETH1 if detected:
> Base I/O 280
> IRQ 3
> MEM D000
> 
> If I remove the first adapter, then it locates the second.
> I have no resource conflicts with any other devices as I have
> disabled all Serial ports, Parallel ports, and have tried other
> resource settings for the adapters. Any ideas? Will anyone
> be at the InstallFest Tuesday, the 18th to help me out?
> 
> Also getting the symbol probs from DHCPD...
> 
> I think I followed the written instructions closely... Hmmmm..
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff McCright
> jeff.mccright at southernunionco.com
> 
>  ----------
> From: kclug at kclug.org
> To: kclug at kclug.org
> Cc: jeff.mccright at southernunionco.com
> Subject: Re: kclug - Kepten! Veer Bean Skend!
> Date: Saturday, July 08, 2000 1:21PM
> 
> I'll second that endorsement.  I'm running the Edge firewall on a 486/66 with just a
> floppy drive and it works beautifully!
> 
> David Carter
> decarter at worldnet.att.net
> 
> Kendric Beachey wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Monty J. Harder wrote:
> > >  The URL to have your ports scanned is Gibson Research,
> > >http://www.grc.com/, look for "Shields Up".
> >
> > I'm trying this right now against my El Cheapo firewall, an old 486 running
> > Edge firewall/router (see http://edge.fireplug.net for details).  I described
> > it on the list a few weeks ago; check the archives.  (unrelated:  as I tested
> > the URL above, I saw that FirePlug has been acquired by Lineo.  Cool, I guess.)
> >
> > I'm using the stock, basic, out of the box configuration on Edge, with just
> > enough config to let it know where the two network cards are.  GRC is still in
> > the process of scanning my ports, but it's taking quite a while, because every
> > scan has to keep waiting until it times out, because my li'l firewall is taking
> > the "talk to the hand" approach.  Here's a sample of the output from the scan...
> >
> > Port  Service  Status    Security Implications
> >  21     FTP    Stealth!  There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that a port (or even
> >                          any computer) exists at this IP address!
> >
> >  23   Telnet   Stealth!  There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that a port (or even
> >                          any computer) exists at this IP address!
> >
> > etc. for the other ports it tried (25, 79, 80, 110, 113, 139, 143, 443).  (It's
> > done scanning now.)
> >
> > You can take this as another endorsement from me of the Edge firewall.  :-)  I
> > looked into linuxrouter and it looked okay too, but it looked a little more
> > difficult to fiddle with to get it to work, whereas Edge was almost hassle-free.
> >
> > --
> > Kendric Beachey
> > ak at kc.rr.com
> >
> 
>