Kepten! Veer Bean Skend!

[Jeff McCright]

I am attempting to run it, but it only sees one of my
SMC 8216T nics(I have two) which are set with the
following config:
Eth0
Base I/O 300
IRQ 10
MEM CC00

What is supposed to be ETH1 if detected:
Base I/O 280
IRQ 3
MEM D000

If I remove the first adapter, then it locates the second.
I have no resource conflicts with any other devices as I have
disabled all Serial ports, Parallel ports, and have tried other
resource settings for the adapters. Any ideas? Will anyone
be at the InstallFest Tuesday, the 18th to help me out?

Also getting the symbol probs from DHCPD...

I think I followed the written instructions closely... Hmmmm..

Thanks,

Jeff McCright
jeff.mccright at southernunionco.com

 ----------
From: kclug at kclug.org
To: kclug at kclug.org
Cc: jeff.mccright at southernunionco.com
Subject: Re: kclug - Kepten! Veer Bean Skend!

I'll second that endorsement.  I'm running the Edge firewall on a 486/66 with just a
floppy drive and it works beautifully!

David Carter
decarter at worldnet.att.net

Kendric Beachey wrote:

> On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Monty J. Harder wrote:
> >  The URL to have your ports scanned is Gibson Research,
> >http://www.grc.com/, look for "Shields Up".
>
> I'm trying this right now against my El Cheapo firewall, an old 486 running
> Edge firewall/router (see http://edge.fireplug.net for details).  I described
> it on the list a few weeks ago; check the archives.  (unrelated:  as I tested
> the URL above, I saw that FirePlug has been acquired by Lineo.  Cool, I guess.)
>
> I'm using the stock, basic, out of the box configuration on Edge, with just
> enough config to let it know where the two network cards are.  GRC is still in
> the process of scanning my ports, but it's taking quite a while, because every
> scan has to keep waiting until it times out, because my li'l firewall is taking
> the "talk to the hand" approach.  Here's a sample of the output from the scan...
>
> Port  Service  Status    Security Implications
>  21     FTP    Stealth!  There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that a port (or even
>                          any computer) exists at this IP address!
>
>  23   Telnet   Stealth!  There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER that a port (or even
>                          any computer) exists at this IP address!
>
> etc. for the other ports it tried (25, 79, 80, 110, 113, 139, 143, 443).  (It's
> done scanning now.)
>
> You can take this as another endorsement from me of the Edge firewall.  :-)  I
> looked into linuxrouter and it looked okay too, but it looked a little more
> difficult to fiddle with to get it to work, whereas Edge was almost hassle-free.
>
> --
> Kendric Beachey
> ak at kc.rr.com
>