15 Jun
2005
15 Jun
'05
3:04 p.m.
Sorry, just lurking in this discussion, and I know this was just a typo (since "liable" is spelled correctly plenty of times in the post), but I thought its placement in the post was particularly funny: On 6/14/05, Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins@tarcanfel.org> wrote: <snip> .... established, in large part through suits against AOL, that the
Operators were not labile, provided they ...
<snip> .... since I knew quite a few BBS operators "back in the day" and all of them most certainly WERE "labile"<http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn2.1?s=labile>.... ;^) JOE