Sorry, just lurking in this discussion, and I know this was just a typo (since "liable" is spelled correctly plenty of times in the post), but I thought its placement in the post was particularly funny:

On 6/14/05, Jonathan Hutchins <hutchins@tarcanfel.org> wrote:

<snip>

.... established, in large part through suits against AOL, that the
Operators were not labile, provided they ...

<snip>

.... since I knew quite a few BBS operators "back in the day" and all of them most certainly WERE "labile"  ....

;^)





JOE