Firefox sercurity questions

[Jason Clinton]

On Saturday 11 June 2005 07:50, Don Erickson wrote:
> So, if I'm following your logic here, you're stating that Firefox is not
> salvageable?

Some interesting evidence for both sides of that argument:

http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/14/1514205

I am also reminded of the bug that affected the rendering of Slashdot for 1 
year between Mozilla 1.4 and Firefox 1.0 because the code in Gecko is so hard 
to parse that a) it took forever to figure out what was happening and b) the 
proposed "fixes" all broke something else.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20050611/0957c73a/attachment.pgp