Another note on KDE 3.1

[Matt Graham]

Well...the thing is.  I'm not sure it does.  I've always used gnome.  I
wasn't asking about KDE 3.1 specifically...just gnome vs kde under the
conditions that bluecurve puts them.  I do want to try out KDE 3.1 after
reading these emails though.

Sorry for the confusion.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Densmore" <DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com>
To: "KCLUG (E-mail)" <kclug at kclug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:08 PM
Subject: RE: Another note on KDE 3.1

> When did Redhat start including KDE 3.1?
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matt Graham [mailto:linux at bizniche.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:54 PM
> > To: Jonathan Hutchins
> > Cc: KCLUG (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: Another note on KDE 3.1
> >
> >
> > Yes, from what I know, it's just a desktop configuration, or
> > theme.  (Icons,
> > backgrounds, menu's, etc.)
> >
> > That's why I wondered.  Under bluecurve...KDE and Gnome look nearly
> > identical.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jonathan Hutchins" <hutchins at tarcanfel.org>
> > To: "Matt Graham" <linux at bizniche.com>
> > Cc: "KCLUG (E-mail)" <kclug at kclug.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:57 PM
> > Subject: Re: Another note on KDE 3.1
> >
> >
> > > Quoting Matt Graham <linux at bizniche.com>:
> > >
> > > > Aside from an asthetics point of view, what do you like
> > better about
> > KDE3.1
> > > > over Gnome?
> > >
> > > > Looking at redhat8 with bluecurve, kde and gnome look the
> > same (from an
> > > > asthetic configuration pov.)   Does KDE have some other
> > features that
> > I"m
> > > > not noticing?
> > >
> > > Isn't bluecurve essentially a Gnome and KDE theme?
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------
> > > This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
> > >
> > >
> > majordomo at kclug.org
> >
> >
> >
> > majordomo at kclug.org
> >
>
>
>