RISC 200 vs CISC 450?

[Mick Ohrberg]

| If your talking pure clock cycles, the 450MHz is 250MHz faster that
200MHz...
| ;-)

:D

[snip]

|                   Since many of today's RISC chips are using the
instructions of
| yesterday's CISC chips, and many CISC chips are using techniques formally
| associated with RISC.

Speaking of that... Isn't a PPro and PII a RISC core with a CISC
'translator' wrapped around it?

	/Mick

|
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
| > [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Andrew Bates
| > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 7:27 PM
| > To: kclug at kclug.org
| > Subject: RISC 200 vs CISC 450?
| >
| >
| > Which ones is faster?  a Pentium III 450 or a RISC 200?  (A desktop
| > versus a Colbalt RaQ2)
| >
| > - Andrew
| >
| >
| >
|
|
|