UCSB bans Windows NT/2K

[Jonathan Hutchins]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: zscoundrel [mailto:zscoundrel at kc.rr.com]

>   I don't see it that way.  If the manufacturer of the OS in 
> question is unwilling or unable to patch the myriad of security holes, 
> (or for that mater, to even ACKNOWLEDGE the problems) then the people that
own the 
> network infrastructure that are responsible for running and 
> maintaining the network should have a say in the OS.

Which would make sense, except that they're REQUIRING XP.  WINDOWS XP.  BY
MICROSOFT.