Novell software 4 or 5
Jason Clinton
clintonj at umkc.edu
Thu Dec 5 19:16:55 CST 2002
Jeremy Fowler wrote:
> One thing you can't dispute is that
> Novell has always been stable and secure when properly configured on reliable
> hardware. Not as stable as Linux, but I would argue its probably more secure.
> When's the last time you heard about a Novell security bug that puts all their
> systems at risk? How many Netware viruses are out there that can bring your
> network to a screeching halt?
Actually, if I could interject, I could dispute this.
Viri and security bugs don't infect the network layer, they affect the operating
system's implementation of it. IIRC, Novel still uses the standard Microsoft
TCP/IP/NETBIOS stack for its comunications which means that your Network is as
vulnerable as ever. Spend a little while looking up ARP poison attacks that can
be carried out on the MS TCP/IP layer for confirmation of this fact.
Novel's software these days amounts to little more than a feable attempt at
sustaining a company that didn't change with the times. It's a simple
authentation and network archtecture maintenace system that anyone with adequate
*nix skills could implement.
Though, I do agree that if you have a company that's paying you to look after
it, more power to you. I personally, though, wouldn't mind seeing Novel's
proprietary network 'technology' going the way of the Do-Do.
More information about the Kclug
mailing list