Qt Versions

[Jonathan Hutchins]

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Edelman [mailto:edelman at speedscript.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 8:49 AM
To: Jonathan Hutchins; 'Lucas Peet'; Brian Densmore
Cc: KCLUG at KCLUG.org
Subject: Re: Qt Versions

On Tuesday 23 April 2002 07:47 am, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> > From: Lucas Peet [mailto:lpeet at eccod.com]
> > Yeah, I just upgraded to KDE 3.0 / Qt 3.0, and I love it, but
> > there are many apps that require Qt 2.2.2+, but not Qt3.0.  I
> > wonder if you can run both on the same system...I don't see why
> > you couldn't??
>
> As I recall, at least one of you did this from source rather than binary,
> and although make install is getting cleverer, it doesn't always cover
> extraneous matters like links as well as RPM does.  Perhaps you can just
> symlink the two versions?
>
> Anybody done this with RPM's yet?
>
I run Gentoo, and compile everything from source :) Anyway, KDE 2.2.2 and
3.0 
can co-exist side by side with no problems. I'm doing that at home on my 
Gentoo box, and at work on my Mandrake box (where I installed everything via

RPM).

Whatever you do, do NOT symlink the two versions. QT 3.x (and as a result,
KDE 
3.x) are NOT binary compatible with KDE 2.2.2/QT 2.3.2 appliations.

Rich