Reply to: not set right?

[Tony Hammitt]

Just the same, some kind of notification would have been nice.  I'm
sure that some of us sent some gems of wisdom to a too limited audience =-]

A big problem with the setup is that by setting the reply field to
the sender, we may send them more copies of the message than they want
by forgetting to remove their address from the To: line.

Not a big problem, but it is a change and people need to take appropriate
steps to counteract.  It will prevent Margrave-itis, though, so it's not
a bad idea =-]  (he he he, sorry Tom :)

Regards,

Tony

BTW, has anyone else been bothered by phone spam from 98.9FM?  If so,
please join me in registering your displeasure by complaining at their
site or sending email to: kqrc at 989therock.com  This shit has got to stop.

Jeff McCright wrote:
> 
> I kinda like this configuration, I now know who I am replying to as
> opposed to the who mail list. I can also respond to the who list or
> just the individual, my choice.
> 
> Just my humble opinion.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff McCright
>  ----------
> From: mike neuliep
> To: bkelsay at askpioneer.com; kclug at kclug.org
> Cc: jeff.mccright at southernunionco.com
> Subject: Re: Reply to: not set right?
> Date: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:21AM
> 
> Brian,
> 
> I'll fix this majordomo config later this weekend.  A couple of weeks ago I
> did a fresh install of Debian 2.2 and got a new version of Majordomo in the
> process for the site.
> 
>         Mike