Greg Brooks wrote:
* Unsophisticated users who are comfy with FTP and don't want to learn new tools.
If the "unsophisticated users" are the ones doing the downloading, then they can still use FTP to download. Your problem was with uploading. Once the file is on the server, it can be downloaded by any mechanism you set up. If your "unsophisticated users" are in your local shop, then you could set up a local FTP server that will automatically push files up to your off-site server when they are dropped in a specific location. If your clients are uploading the files to you, then I don't get why it's your concern how their connection is set up.
* Many different clients who need the bandwidth boost, so a point-to-point solution isn't a good fit.
Do you have many clients uploading? Or just many clients downloading, and you doing all of the uploading? If you are the only one uploading, then it isn't much of a problem. There are many creative solutions you could set up. The question is if the time and effort to set it up and make it transparent to your users is worth saving a few hundred bucks a month.
-----Original Message----- From: Bradley Hook [mailto:bhook@kssb.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:21 PM To: gregb@west-third.com Cc: kclug@kclug.org Subject: Re: DSL link aggregation?
Is it possible to get two ADSL lines to work together to increase up-stream bandwidth w/o the help of your ISP(s)? Yes. Is it easy? No. Will it actually double your bandwidth? No. Are you better off finding another solution? Yes.
There are a variety of ways you could make this work, but none of them are going to do quite what you want. You could wrap your regular connections in a virtual interface that load balances packets over two different interfaces, and then have a similar setup on the server that is receiving the packets. This solution will end up only getting you a slight improvement in bandwidth because of the overhead you are going to have in wrapping the other connections. In addition, you will lose latency.
If you aren't tied to FTP in particular, you could hack together a BitTorrent setup where your home machine seeds your files on both public IPs, and your server can then download different fragments of the file from both connections simultaneously. If this is an option, you could set up a private BitTorrent tracker on your server and bond together dozens of ADSL circuits if you wanted to. You'll piss your ISP off if they figure out what your're up to though. You would probably want to write a shell script or something to set up the .torrent, push it to the server (via rsync or some such), and then cause the server to initiate a bt download.
Greg Brooks wrote:
Anyone successfully used link aggregation to combine two ADSL lines for greater outbound bandwidth?
Because it's asymmetrical bandwidth, I'm fine for inbound speed. but I need to regularly move large files to FTP, and it's becoming an issue.
So, if I'm moving data from a single user (me) to a single point (an FTP site), does link aggregation double my bandwidth? I understand how it would work in multi-users-to-the-net environments, but can't quite get how (or if) it would work in this scenario.
I really don't want to pay the $1025/mo for a T1 line to the house, but it's my only other option.
Any help much appreciated.
Thanks, Greg
_______________________________________________ Kclug mailing list Kclug@kclug.org http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
-- ~Bradley Hook Education Systems Administrator Kansas State School for the Blind 1100 State Avenue Kansas City, KS 66102 Voice: (913) 281-3308 ext. 363 Mobile: (913) 645-9958 Facsimile: (913) 281-3104 http://www.kssb.net ****************************************************************************************** Confidentiality Statement: This message and accompanying documents are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, and contain information intended for the specified individual(s) only. This information is confidential unless explicitly indicated otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by E-mail, and delete the original message. ******************************************************************************************