Moratorium on moderation/censorship/general whines.-give it up for lent eh?

[Philip Dorr]

how about this the one true religion based upon Jesus Christ is the one in
the bible! not the Catholic church, which did not exist untill around 100
years after the death of Christ

--
Philip Dorr

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 3:59 AM, Luke -Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:

> On Saturday 22 March 2008, Leo Mauler wrote:
> > --- Luke -Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > > On Saturday 22 March 2008, Leo Mauler wrote:
> > > > The Pope's official apology to Galileo didn't come till the 1990s.
> > >
> > > There is nothing to apologize for.
> > > (nor was the man you're referring to a pope)
> >
> > The man who apologized about the Catholic Church's error in its complete
> and
> > unqualified condemnation of Galileo's heliocentrism,
>
> The condemnation was rather Galileo's claim that the Bible was in error,
> not
> so much Galileo's erroneous heliocentrism itself.
>
> > *Pope John Paul II*, wasn't a Pope?  This may come as a surprise to the
> > Roman Catholic Church, since they generally keep very good track of who
> is
> > or is not the Pope.
>
> John Paul II was an antipope and is recognized as such by at least the
> majority of Catholic bishops.
>
> > > > So since Vatican II is an official part of the Roman Catholic
> Church, we
> > > > can assume you didn't like the way Catholicism was going with
> Vatican II
> > > > so you forked the doctrine and didn't apply any of the Vatican II
> > > > updates?
> > >
> > > No. Your premise is incorrect, since Vatican II is not part of the
> Church,
> > > but is a fork of it. If you want it in terms of technology, Wireshark
> > > (Vat2) is a fork of Ethereal (Catholicism), but took most of the
> > > developers and users with it.
> >
> > But a doctrine as old as geocentrism is the doctrine that the Pope is
> the
> > head of the Roman Catholic Church, and the official Roman Catholic
> Church
> > Pope at the time of Vatican II chose the Vatican II version of
> Catholicism.
>
> Couldn't figure out how to parse that sentence, but...
>
> Geocentrism, not being a matter of faith nor morals, is not something
> which
> the Church herself has a teaching or doctrine either for or against.
>
> The Vatican II sect split from the Church after Pope Pius XII's death,
> taking
> advantage of the interrigum to quietly kick the Catholics out of the
> Vatican
> and assist their antipope-to-be in usurping the location and civil
> authorities traditionally held by the pope.
>
> > If we spoke in terms of the Linux Kernel, then what happened was that
> there
> > was a kernel fork, you went with one version, and Linus Torvalds (the
> keeper
> > of the official kernel) went with the other version. Linus' version is
> the
> > only official version, so all others aren't the official version.
>
> More accurate would be Linus dying and leaving the official kernel in his
> will
> to Willy Tarreau, but an actively-work-against-binary-modules faction
> supresses this information and makes Greg K-H the new main kernel
> maintainer.
>
> Greg K-H's branch takes control of kernel.org and other official
> resources,
> implementing the binary-module-blocker, while Willy Tarreau knows of the
> will
> and "forks" to continue the de jure official Linux tree, as Linus had
> planned
> it.
>
> > I realize that you feel strongly about your own theology, but in the end
> the
> > version of Roman Catholicism that has the Pope at the helm really is the
> > official version of Roman Catholicism.  This means that no matter how
> much
> > you consider Vatican II to be a falsehood, it is still the official
> policy
> > of the official Roman Catholic Church.
>
> There are about ten people today who claim to be pope of the Catholic
> Church.
> What makes you think Benedict XVI is the one? Keep in mind that among the
> many guarantees Christ made for His Church, majority was not one of them.
>
> The Catholic Church teaches (as unchangable doctrine) that to become pope,
> someone must first be Catholic, not a heretic as Montini (the more recent
> antipope John XXIII) and his successors have been. The Church also teaches
> that once a new pope is chosen, he must be first consecrated a bishop
> before
> he is actually the pope (this can also be proven by logic-- since the pope
> is
> bishop of Rome, he must in fact be a bishop in the first place).
> The "consecration" that allegedly made Benedict XVI a bishop was
> officially
> condemned by Pope Leo XIII in 1896.
> _______________________________________________
> Kclug mailing list
> Kclug at kclug.org
> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20080322/8827565a/attachment.htm>