RoadRunner nonsense

[Oren Beck]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Oren Beck <orenbeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is it ethical to break established de facto practices for self serving
> > reasons?
>
> If it was only that I wouldn't really care. Unless I'm mistaken, this
> is more than a "de facto" standard, this is a agreed upon standard, ie
> spec. This isn't some office format, this is something several
> engineers sat down, through about, published, RFCed and then
> finalized.
> --
> Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
> ( www.pembo13.com )
>

Yet RFC to all it's adhocracy cred- still is de facto. Absent a legal
precedent elevating RFC above what it presently is. Were RFC considerd
actionable to break?  The vulture lawyers would be circling comcraptastic's
undead corpse.


-- 
Oren Beck

816.729.3645
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kclug.org/pipermail/kclug/attachments/20080226/bdafd312/attachment-0001.htm