Hello, KC!

[Luke-Jr]

On Wednesday 17 August 2005 17:00, David Ambs wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Luke-Jr wrote:
> > I am, for the time being. It shouldn't be necessary, though.
>
> I agree it shouldn't be necessary.. I've been having to do it for the past
> year or so, since most of SBCs dynamic pools are blacklisted also... Not
> really a big deal for me.

I haven't had to do much, since it's only the rare mail server that blocks 
dynamic IPs...

> > Most all IPs are dynamic and it's ridiculous to expect all mail servers
> > to be on a rare static IP. Sane spam filters will only check lists of
> > abused IPs, not a list of nearly every IP online.
>
> I've never really tried a static from SBC/Earthlink/whaterver isp. Wonder
> if those are permitted? Wonder where they get their dynamic/static lsits
> at.

SORBS has a dynamic list that ISPs send them.