[OT] Clinton Assault Weapon Ban Ending - was-RE:gmailinitiations

[crash 3m]

Isn't gun control hitting what your shooting at?


On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:59:52 -0500, David H. Askew <daskew2 at kc.rr.com> wrote:
> Cliche answers provide neither real insight, or solutions, but rather
> oversimplify complex issues. Thanks for the "McQuote".
> 
> -dave
> 
> On Saturday 11 September 2004 1:55 pm, James R. Sissel wrote:
> > > I think most people would agree that, despite the unparralleled
> >
> > intelligence
> >
> > > of the framers, the Constitution is a document of limited wording, and
> >
> > that
> >
> > > it has been utilized by the Supreme Court as a basis for many decisions
> >
> > that
> >
> > > the framers never envisioned.  While I would agree that, under a free
> > > society, gun-control of any kind is a threat to my liberty, I would also
> > > agree, that we need to have a good balance between personal freedom and
> > > national security.
> >
> >  ''They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety," observed Benjamin Franklin, "deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kclug mailing list
> > Kclug at kclug.org
> > http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
> _______________________________________________
> Kclug mailing list
> Kclug at kclug.org
> http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
> 



-- 
Got gmail? I do hahaha