Proposed Web site redesign (beta)

[Tom Bruno]

I took a look at the plone sites both with a screen reader and lynx,  
they render almost exactly like the proposed KcLug site. I'm not seeing 
a difference.   I like Chris Bier's solution.  We use what we have, and 
code on it to make it better.

Gerald Combs wrote:

>Jason Clinton wrote:
>  
>
>>Steven Hildreth wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Is w3/wia and w3/HTML compliance a requirement of the replacement
>>>offering? Never was mentioned to me when I offered to create a new
>>>modern, dynamic replacement site.
>>>      
>>>
>>I'm sorry no one said so. Anyone who does web design should already be
>>familiar with those requirement; it's something of a given -- perhaps
>>Hal and Chris assumed you knew that.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>No CMS stock package I have found (I have tested several for a
>>>previous project including; PhpNuke, PostNuke, Slashcode, eGroupare,
>>>Mambo, and XOOPS) generates either w3/wia or w3/HTML compliant code.
>>>      
>>>
>>We may be able to yet find one that does.
>>    
>>
>
>Such as plone?  From http://www.plone.org:
>
>  "Plone is standard. Plone carefully follows standards for usability
>   and accessibility. Plone pages are compliant with US Section 508, and
>   the W3C's AA rating for accessibility, in addition to using
>   best-practice web standards like XHTML and CSS."
>_______________________________________________
>Kclug mailing list
>Kclug at kclug.org
>http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
>  
>