FUD
KRFinch at dstsystems.com
KRFinch at dstsystems.com
Fri Jan 2 16:12:27 CST 2004
"magnificently stable"?!? That's rich.
My favorite Win95 story comes from when I was building systems for a
payroll project I was on. One time we had 11 identical HP systems that we
were building, and the only thing on them that required a custom driver was
the video card. We set them all up in a row and clicked the same buttons
on down the line during the setup to set them all up identically. 3 worked
the way that they were supposed to by the time we were done loading
Windows, and the remaining 8 all had one problem or another that required
either reconfiguration or reloading to bring them up to spec.
- Kevin
Dave Hull
<dphull at insipid.c
om> To
Sent by:
owner-kclug at marau cc
der.illiana.net kclug at kclug.org
Subject
Re: FUD
01/02/2004 08:52
AM
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
> Could we have a little less FUD in here please?
>
> Windows sucks. It's also a great collection of software, incredibly
flexible
> and powerful, incorporating some fantastic coding and some brilliant
ideas.
> Windows 95 was magnificently stable and reliable for it's day.
That's rich, "Windows 95 was magnificently stable..." I never saw more than
three or four days uptime on a Windows 95 box in our environment supporting
a
couple thousand 95 boxes. I wouldn't call that stable nor reliable. Still
it
was better than 3.x.
> RedHat has become the Microsoft of the Linux world, with greed-based
> licensing plans
Hm, I just figured they were trying to stay afloat. Something that most OS
based businesses have had a difficult time doing. I bet some of the folks
that
work for Red Hat have families to take care of and I doubt any of them are
going to be future millionaires a la more than 2000 MS employees (and
counting).
--
Dave Hull
http://insipid.com
"What time is it?"
"I don't know, it keeps changing."
More information about the Kclug
mailing list