Interesting the AMD 2500 is a slower clock than the 2400
Hanasaki JiJi
hanasaki at hanaden.com
Mon Mar 10 17:53:07 CST 2003
Hey.. I like AMD too. my slot A 600 outperforms the celeron 800.
Anyone know how to fix the amd based board? tis beeping :( maybe a bad
memory controller? RAM chips work fine in the celeron board.
the point was the barton 2500 was a slower clock than the xp2400
Brian Densmore wrote:
> Actually not. They have a better design that allows them to process
> input at better efficiency than Intel's designs. AMD chips have changed
> significantly since they made 486 clones. They have even had Intel copy
> some of their ideas. AMD chips are superior to equivalent Intel chips. I
> use nothing but AMD chips for that reason and additionally Intel's
> founders are crooks who stole a patented idea from their boss and
> started their own company.
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Aaron [mailto:aaron at aarons.net]
>>Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:49 AM
>>To: numa at thenuma.com; kclug at kclug.org
>>Subject: Re: Ineresting the AMD 2500 is a slower clock than the 2400
>>
>>
>>I don't use AMD's for specifically this reason. The VP of
>>Marketing from
>>AMD and I had a discussion about this 10 years ago with the
>>486's. They
>>wanted to call their dx2-80 a dx4-100 because the performance
>>was equivalent
>>(in their opinion). I spent a three hour lunch explaining to
>>him why that
>>was wrong. Now they're doing it with the Thunderbirds. It's
>
>
>
>
--
= Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the =
= right things. - Peter Drucker =
=_______________________________________________________________=
= http://www.sun.com/service/sunps/jdc/javacenter.pdf =
= www.sun.com | www.javasoft.com | http://wwws.sun.com/sunone =
More information about the Kclug
mailing list