The List has returned! [x-adr]

[Rich Edelman]

Whoa, that post is too technical for me. :)

RIch

On Thursday 31 July 2003 03:40 pm, Scott Smith wrote:
> Technically, if you want to get technical, the GPL technically isn't
> OPEN source because it restricts the manner in which you can distribute
> applications based on this license. A technically TRUE *OPEN* source
> license would be something like the BSD license.
>
> Scott
>
> (Postfix pwnz)
>
> Frank Wiles wrote:
> >  Yes the ability to distributed modified binaries is a small one,
> >  but like I said I don't like his license because it is not Open
> >  Source.
>