The List has returned! [x-adr]

[Scott Smith]

Technically, if you want to get technical, the GPL technically isn't 
OPEN source because it restricts the manner in which you can distribute 
applications based on this license. A technically TRUE *OPEN* source 
license would be something like the BSD license.

Scott

(Postfix pwnz)

Frank Wiles wrote:

>  Yes the ability to distributed modified binaries is a small one, 
>  but like I said I don't like his license because it is not Open
>  Source.
>  
>