Postfix
Brian Densmore
DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com
Tue Dec 16 18:10:03 CST 2003
I'm using postfix.
Uptime: 344 days. It would be over 1000 but
there was the physical move of the equipment
from one location to another and the darn ice-storm
that knocked out most of KC a ways back. Also, a very
low usage box (really just a personal server) so
I don't get much spam there and not very much mail at
all. I am in the process (someday) of migrating to
a qmail system. I'm running this on a Pentium 75 with
40MB RAM along with apache+ssl, webmail, sshd and local DNS.
Brian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Attaway
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jonathan Hutchins wrote:
>
> > Any postfix users out there?
>
> I used it for several months, but went back to sendmail.
>
> Postfix has a simple configuration file in english. This may
> be good if
> sendmail's m4 macros seem scary. But I didn't like how
> Postfix handled
> spam, accepting each mail even if it was an invalid user,
> then "sending"
> it back as a bounce. This was a problem as it amplified the bandwidth
> from spammers to users that didn't exist. Postfix
> effectively DOS'ed my
> computer by crashing the memory to the end of swap. I
> stopped updating
> the IP address to my attaway.net domain and went back to sendmail.
> Sendmail seems much less memory intensive and behaves very
> well on my 32MB
> box with all my other applications.
>
> Postfix's configuration file seemed rather limited in
> configuring how it
> was to handle different conditions. Sendmail seems to be written from
> experience and does not quit. Since my computer has been
> running for 247
> days without a reboot, I'm sticking with sendmail. It works.
> Postfix
> didn't.
More information about the Kclug
mailing list