kcwireless-talk: Everest

[Glenn Crocker]

That part of their AUP is about acting as a server (with inbound connections
coming from Everest).  My understanding from folks who would know, but who
aren't Everest representatives, is that KCWireless-style use is okay as long
as you don't violate the excessive bandwidth provision.

-glenn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-kcwireless-talk at kcwireless.net
> [mailto:owner-kcwireless-talk at kcwireless.net]On Behalf Of Gene Dascher
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: kcwireless-talk at kcwireless.net; Kclug
> Subject: kcwireless-talk: Everest
>
>
> I just read the following on Everest's web site in their Acceptable Use
> Policy.  It doesn't look like they'll be much better than RoadRunner or
> Comcast.
>
> http://www.everestkc.com/legal_aup.php
>
> "Customer may not run a server in connection with the Everest cable modem
> recreational service, nor may Customer provide network services to others
> via the Everest cable modem service. Examples of prohibited programs
> include, but are not limited to, mail or simple mail transfer protocol
> (smtp) server, http server, ftp server, internet relay chat (irc) server,
> dynamic host control protocol (dhcp) servers, domain name servers (dns),
> news or nntp servers and multi-user interactive forums."
>
>
> Gene