GPG

[Brian Densmore]

Well just as a matter of argument.
In this day and age everyone should really be signing 
and encrypting their email. That really ought to be
the lowest common denominator. But in this age of
convenience, no one (self included) wants to go to
the trouble of adding that extra step and do the
right thing. It's just easier to let it slid.
To take the Microsloth way and be blissfully unknowing.

$0.02,
Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Hutchins [mailto:hutchins at opus1.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:33 AM
> To: kclug at kclug.org
> Subject: Re: GPG
> 
> 
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Clinton" <clintonj at umkc.edu>
> 
> > Ok, this is the fourth person to ask so here's the 
> explination once and
> > for all:
> 
> So you've had four people note that if you have anything 
> interesting to say,
> we can't see it because of your arrogant attitude toward the 
> most common
> mail software on the net, and your reply is pretty much that 
> you don't give
> a hoot.
> 
> This has been said so many times some people seem to think it 
> no longer
> needs saying, or to have simply forgotten it: IF YOU ARE 
> POSTING TO A PUBLIC
> MAILING LIST, ASSUME THE LEAST COMMON DENOMINATOR FOR MAIL 
> READING SOFTWARE,
> POST PLAIN, UNADORNED ASCII TEXT, DO NOT USE ELABORATE 
> SIGNATURES, DO NOT
> INCLUDE BINARY ENHANCEMENTS OR ATTACHMENTS, AND USE THE 
> COMMON LANGUAGE OF
> THE LIST (in this case American English).
> 
> Linux is all about doing it your own way though, and we can 
> all just skip
> over your unreadable messages like so much spam.
> 
> 
> 
> majordomo at kclug.org
>