ubench speed test results
Lucas Peet
sirsky at lucastek.com
Thu Nov 14 20:11:04 CST 2002
>Note the performance is slightly less than previously...probably due to
>using the -O2 default rather than -O3.
Not so! Well, probably not. I ran ubench on my system 4 times
consecutively, and each one was different. I believe it partly has to
do with processes already running on your box, but also the inconsistent
nature of benchmarks. I think that all the online 'reviews' of systems
with benchmarks should run them a few times, and take the highest score,
since obviously the hardware is capable of higher, but the circumstances
at the time weren't quite right for the optimal score.
-Lucas
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
[mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net] On Behalf Of Charles
Steinkuehler
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 11:00 AM
To: Kclug at Kclug. Org
Subject: Re: ubench speed test results
Jeremy Fowler wrote:
> Your probably using GNU GCC >= 3.0, which changed those -malign-x
optimizations
> to -falign-x options instead. So go thru and change the -m to -f.
You are correct...after the translation:
[root at berryton ubench-0.32]# ./ubench
Unix Benchmark Utility v.0.3
Copyright (C) July, 1999 PhysTech, Inc.
Author: Sergei Viznyuk <sv at phystech.com>
http://www.phystech.com/download/ubench.html
Linux 2.4.9-12 #1 Tue Oct 30 18:12:52 EST 2001 alpha
Ubench CPU: 12578
Ubench MEM: 17101
--------------------
Ubench AVG: 14839
Note the performance is slightly less than previously...probably due to
using the -O2 default rather than -O3.
--
Charles Steinkuehler
charles at steinkuehler.net
More information about the Kclug
mailing list