Speed test (results from first test)

[Mick Ohrberg]

It's very interesting to note that the ASSIGNMENT and NEURAL NET items are
lower than a P90. Anyone have any ideas why?

	/Mick

| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
| [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Jason
| Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:26 PM
| To: Mick Ohrberg; kclug at kclug.org
| Subject: Re: Speed test (results from first test)
|
|
| Here is my test on a Dual PII 450 - 512KB cache  , (I know it is a single
| thread test) if ram matters I have 1GB running Slackware 8.1
|
|
| bash-2.05a# ./nbench
|
| BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
| Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
| Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
|
| TEST                : Iterations/sec.  : Old Index   : New Index
|                     :                  : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
| --------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
| NUMERIC SORT        :          195.66  :       5.02  :       1.65
| STRING SORT         :          18.139  :       8.10  :       1.25
| BITFIELD            :      5.8663e+07  :      10.06  :       2.10
| FP EMULATION        :          11.927  :       5.72  :       1.32
| FOURIER             :          3646.3  :       4.15  :       2.33
| ASSIGNMENT          :          2.5679  :       9.77  :       2.53
| IDEA                :          412.37  :       6.31  :       1.87
| HUFFMAN             :          197.34  :       5.47  :       1.75
| NEURAL NET          :           3.876  :       6.23  :       2.62
| LU DECOMPOSITION    :          113.53  :       5.88  :       4.25
| ==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK
| RESULTS==========================
| INTEGER INDEX       : 6.958
| FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 5.335
| Baseline (MSDOS*)   : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
| ==============================LINUX DATA
| BELOW===============================
| C compiler          : gcc version 2.7.2.3
| libc                : libc.so.5.4.38
| MEMORY INDEX        : 1.884
| INTEGER INDEX       : 1.634
| FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
| Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3,
| libc-5.4.38
| * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
| bash-2.05a#
| bash-2.05a# FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
| bash: FLOATING-POINT: command not found
| bash-2.05a# Baseline (LINUX)    : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache,
| gcc 2.7.2.3,
| libc-5.4.38
| bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(LINUX)'
| bash-2.05a# * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
|
|
| On Sunday 10 November 2002 8:02 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
| > I found something called nbench
| > (http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/bmark.html). You may want to give it a
| > whirl. Unfortunately, since it's a single-threaded test, your
| duals won't
| > do you much good. I haven't been able to find a multi-threading
| test yet.
| >
| > 	/Mick
| >
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net
| > | [mailto:owner-kclug at marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Jason
| > | Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:42 PM
| > | To: Mick Ohrberg; kclug at kclug.org
| > | Subject: Re: Speed test (results from first test)
| > |
| > |
| > | What is this test?  I have a dual PPro 200 and a Dual PII 450
| > |
| > |
| > | Jason
| > |
| > | On Sunday 10 November 2002 4:54 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
| > | > Hm, it seems that (in this test), the SPARC was slowest.
| Keep in mind,
| > | > however, that the compiled code that gcc generates on the SPARC is
| >
| > 32-bit
| >
| > | > code (right?). Now on to find a multi-threading test! :)
| > | >
| > | > 	/Mick
| >
|
| --
| http://www.hailmaryfullofgrace.net
|
|
|