KCLUG --> KCMUG?

Jonathan Hutchins hutchins at opus1.com
Sat Mar 2 00:21:14 CST 2002


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Densmore [mailto:DensmoreB at ctbsonline.com]

> ... everything I did in M$ was so 
> -=painfully slow=-. I have gotten spoiled by how much faster 
> everything is in Linux.

Oh bull$hit.

> Then we also did a defrag on the disk, we let that run overnight.

So you're talking old, slow hardware.

> True it takes KDE a while to come up after logging in, but each app
> isn't really slow. Some are, but not many. At least the ones I use.

As long as you don't try to browse the net, use a GUI file manager, or mail
client, or do most of the normal GUI tasks, yeah, sure, it's "faster".  So's
DOS.

GUI speed is NOT one of Linux' bragging rights - as long as we use the X11
model, it can't be, more integrated systems will outperform it on equivalent
hardware.

Yes, I've seen a Linux box that appeared faster than a Windows box - but it
was Linux on new hardware vs. four or five year old hardware running Windows
98.




More information about the Kclug mailing list