KCLUG?!?!?!

[Robert S. Berg]

Rich/Ed/Anyone... correct this info if incorrect:

kclug is running (according to netcraft.com)
Apache/1.3.3 - Debian/GNU PHP/3.0.5 on Linux 

-Robert

Ripcrd6 wrote:
> 
> Comments follow nested:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Aaron Norton <anorton98 at earthlink.net>
> 
> > I am new to this list and just found your website this morning.
> > I have been in the Kansas UNIX/Linux Users Association, off and
> > on for a while now and was always interested in finding something
> > closer to home since I live in KC.
> >
> > There is one thing that bothers me about KCLUG. When I went to
> > your website, I happened to notice that it was built with (and
> > I really hate to say this word) Microsoft.
> 
> Our original page was lost when the server crashed months ago as I recall.
> Rich Minear kindly replaced it with a template sort of page with the tools
> he had available and knew how to use.   We have had some discussion on the
> content, but up until recently have not had anyone that could take over
> maintaining the site.   The folks at www.kclinux.com and a few other
> HTMLers have offered their services.  Their initial rework is here:
> http://www.kclinux.com/kclug   The format is similar to their KClinuc site.
> >
> > My question is this - what kind of Linux Users Group builds their
> > website using Microsoft Frontpage? I realize that not everyone is
> > against Micros??t as much as me, but this just does not make any
> > sense at all.
> >
> Soon to be changed like I said.
> 
> > You are supposedly supporting the Open Source Revolution, but
> > you are using the most closed companies products to achieve this
> > goal.
> >
> Most people don't look at the webpage source when they view a page, but it
> should be expected with this crowd.
> 
> > For the sake of not crashing what is probably a microsoft server,
> > I will keep this short. If it is in fact not a microsoft server,
> > please accept my sincere appoligies for the previous statement.
> >
> As far as I know it is a Redhat or a Slackware server.   (Rich could
> confirm this.)  And it is running quite fine thank you.
> 
> >
> > Let the flaming begin!!!
> >
> > Aaron Norton
> We even let flamers ;-) attend the meetings, but you generally don't get
> the email flames here like you might get elsewhere.
> Be glad to see you at the next meeting.   We skipped the January one at the
> normal time due to Y2k related commitments.   Most of us are computer
> people after all.
> 
> Welcome to the list,
> Rip
> "A mind is a terrible thing."
> 
> P.S.  I currently use Outlook Express at work, so don't bother looking at
> the source of this msg., I'll save you the trouble.   I have been
> evaluating The Bat! from www.ritlabs.com as an alternate email client under
> Windows, which I am forced to use.
>