Obviously, this could start (and has started) plenty of religious flame wars over the years. This is not my intention. I am wondering what points I can use, specifically, as arguments to make a case for FOSS, specifically Linux, in a business setting. If I were hired as the IT director of a small company, and was asked to build an IT Director of a small company, my inclination would be to begin building with Linux and FOSS, but when my boss came to me and asked me why I chose those technologies, honestly I would have very few concrete reasons. Here is what I have so far: 1. I agree with the philosophy behind FOSS 2. There are a plethora of plug-ins developed to help extend our infrastructure for our current (and future) needs 3. If we find that a piece of software we downloaded (or purchased) is broken, or doesn't do what we need it to do, we have the source code and (hopefully) the resources to fix/change it. 4. Not only are there several (competing) options for paid support, there are a ton of free message boards, mailing lists and IRC channels to get assistance from, making our virtual knowledge bank HUGE 5. Total cost of ownership is going to be a fraction of that of closed source products. 6. When needed, we can find closed source software to do what we need when we can't find a FOSS solution That's where I am at. I am a programmer and know only the basics of networking, so the networking possibilities within FOSS elude me. Of course, it's always most important to use the most appropriate tool for the job, but I would give preference to FOSS tools over proprietary tools. Again, my intention is not to start arguments, only to pull together reasons why FOSS is a credible business alternative to proprietary software solutions.
Eric Raymond's book has a few good essays on this. If you're interested in reading them, he's posted them on his website for free. It's a good hour or so of reading, but it's worth it. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/homesteading/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/magic-cauldron/ On 10/7/07, leenix <leenix@kc.rr.com> wrote:
Obviously, this could start (and has started) plenty of religious flame wars over the years. This is not my intention. I am wondering what points I can use, specifically, as arguments to make a case for FOSS, specifically Linux, in a business setting. If I were hired as the IT director of a small company, and was asked to build an IT Director of a small company, my inclination would be to begin building with Linux and FOSS, but when my boss came to me and asked me why I chose those technologies, honestly I would have very few concrete reasons. Here is what I have so far:
1. I agree with the philosophy behind FOSS 2. There are a plethora of plug-ins developed to help extend our infrastructure for our current (and future) needs 3. If we find that a piece of software we downloaded (or purchased) is broken, or doesn't do what we need it to do, we have the source code and (hopefully) the resources to fix/change it. 4. Not only are there several (competing) options for paid support, there are a ton of free message boards, mailing lists and IRC channels to get assistance from, making our virtual knowledge bank HUGE 5. Total cost of ownership is going to be a fraction of that of closed source products. 6. When needed, we can find closed source software to do what we need when we can't find a FOSS solution
That's where I am at. I am a programmer and know only the basics of networking, so the networking possibilities within FOSS elude me. Of course, it's always most important to use the most appropriate tool for the job, but I would give preference to FOSS tools over proprietary tools. Again, my intention is not to start arguments, only to pull together reasons why FOSS is a credible business alternative to proprietary software solutions.
_______________________________________________ Kclug mailing list Kclug@kclug.org http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug
--- leenix <leenix@kc.rr.com> wrote:
If I were hired as the IT director of a small company, and was asked to build an IT Director of a small company, my inclination would be to begin building with Linux and FOSS
Um, isn't building an IT Director more a hardware issue than a software issue? ;-) On a related issue, just how far along are FOSS A.I. solutions? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Personally, If I were in that situation I would start with the budget for the IT Director. Then after that I would look at the HARDware (i.e. Executive Assistant for the IT director). Software would be my final destination after evaluating the HARDware. :)
-----Original Message----- From: kclug-bounces@kclug.org [mailto:kclug-bounces@kclug.org] On Behalf Of Leo Mauler Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:35 AM To: kclug@kclug.org Subject: Re: FOSS Solutions
--- leenix <leenix@kc.rr.com> wrote:
If I were hired as the IT director of a small company, and was asked to build an IT Director of a small company, my inclination would be to begin building with Linux and FOSS
Um, isn't building an IT Director more a hardware issue than a software issue? ;-)
On a related issue, just how far along are FOSS A.I. solutions?
participants (4)
-
Billy Crook -
leenix -
Leo Mauler -
Phil Thayer