Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed? Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Earle Beason wrote:
Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed?
Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
Luke -Jr is easily confused. Q: How do I do <something or other>. A: You're an idiot. Anybody who wants to do <something or other> is an idiot. A2: I don't know about php, but I'm sure someone else does. -- Hal Duston hald@kc.rr.com Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) : (times 4) On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 04:15:22PM -0500, Luke -Jr wrote:
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me. On Sunday 28 October 2007, Earle Beason wrote:
Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed?
Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
On 10/27/07, Luke -Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Earle Beason wrote:
Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed?
Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
Does "because I like it" count? -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
On 10/27/07, Luke -Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
or why anyone would use Gentoo when they could use BSD -- halloween link: http://tinyurl.com/ytm8ba
On Saturday 27 October 2007, David Nicol wrote:
On 10/27/07, Luke -Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
or why anyone would use Gentoo when they could use BSD
Gentoo supports BSD ;) On a serious note, I'm familiar with the GNU system more than UNIX. Linux also has better hardware support, in theory.
On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:30 PM, Luke -Jr wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007, David Nicol wrote:
On 10/27/07, Luke -Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
or why anyone would use Gentoo when they could use BSD
Gentoo supports BSD ;)
Whoever uses Gentoo tools on BSD is just not smart (ports/packages have been around a lot longer than Gentoo has). If they didn't like the way the current package manager why not try to improve upon it and not replace it. I do like writing my own software, but at times rewriting/porting seems wasteful and this is one of them.
On Sunday 28 October 2007, Jonathan Otsuka wrote:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 11:30 PM, Luke -Jr wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007, David Nicol wrote:
On 10/27/07, Luke -Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
Why anyone would use Fedora for anything, let alone a server, has always confused me.
or why anyone would use Gentoo when they could use BSD
Gentoo supports BSD ;)
Whoever uses Gentoo tools on BSD is just not smart (ports/packages have been around a lot longer than Gentoo has).
Every package builder/manager has its strengths and weaknesses. Whether someone is better off with ports or portage is dependent on what they want to do with it.
If they didn't like the way the current package manager why not try to improve upon it and not replace it. I do like writing my own software, but at times rewriting/porting seems wasteful and this is one of them.
Sometimes the original architecture just isn't flexible enough.
Earle Beason wrote:
Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed?
Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
The key thing to remember is that the core steps to getting php to work on Fedora is the same as on any other distribution. You need to install the php package (in this case it is in rpm format). You need to restart the server (service httpd restart). You then put your PHP code in a file ending in .php and attempt to access it. If this doesn't work then look at your log files for clues. If you want to setup Fedora to be a webserver then ensure that: 1) You open up port 80 (and maybe 443 for https) on your local firewall. 2) You ensure that the webserver will start up on reboot. -- ======================================================== D. Hageman <dhageman@dracken.com> Dracken Technology, Inc. http://www.dracken.com/ ========================================================
On 10/28/07, Earle Beason <Earle-Beason@kc.rr.com> wrote:
Playing around in my spare time I have been trying to get fedora 7 to do the php includes, but for some reason I missed something and it not getting the desired results, anybody have a clue what I might have missed?
Also, what steps to I need to take to have my Fedora 7 machine acts as a web server
You'll find a lot more help in the fedora mailing list. `yum install httpd php` is normally enough. This link may also be of use to you: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com )
participants (7)
-
Arthur Pemberton -
D. Hageman -
David Nicol -
Earle Beason -
Hal Duston -
Jonathan Otsuka -
Luke -Jr