"The head of SCO, a group that maintains Linux is a derivative product of copyrights they hold, ..." that's all the farther I read, but that phrasing seems to me to indicate that the reporter, or at least the stylebook for wifinetnews, might rightly classify maintaining that linux is a derivative of the santa cruz operation's copyright in the same bucket as classifying creationism as a science. On 4/22/07, Oren Beck <orenbeck@gmail.com> wrote:

... SCO ...

http://wifinetnews.com/archives/007571.html

Do note that some of the "logic" used is rather incoherent at best.

Ah well, at least they are not _yet_ overtly dragging Linux into it. Nonetheless, the perceived linkage is almost as bad in social affect.

huh? Maybe there was a different article there earlier ... oh it's a link to a kind of matter-of-fact and tired alarmist piece about teens able to "view porn all day long" while their parents think they're doing their homework, which is certain to get all those deseretnews-reading teens discussing amongst themselves exactly how they can accomplish that feat. Anyone know what Deseret News's stand on creationism is? (that's a joke, please don;t answer) -- Is the opposite of "tax and spend" "borrow and burrow?"