This is a test.
Thanks! Now that we're on a new machine, are there any features we should add?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2026, at 10:31, Caleb Herbert via KCLUG wrote:
This is a test.
-- Caleb Herbert PO Box 234 East Lynne, MO 64743 Chat: caleb@csh.snikket.chat [1] calebh.top
[1] caleb@csh.snikket.chat https://xmpp.link/#caleb@csh.snikket.chat _______________________________________________ KCLUG mailing list -- kclug@kclug.org To unsubscribe send an email to kclug-leave@kclug.org https://kclug.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/kclug.kclug.org/
Caleb's message passed DKIM (2048 bit key).
Caleb's message used utf-8 base64 encoding.
Chris' message used us-ascii 7-bit encoding. Seems like I remember 7-bit/ascii can be problematic for DKIM signatures when messages pass through multiple layers like amavis, spam assassin, postfix, etc. But I thought I remembered SPF checks in headers too so there's that. :) (It may have been spam assassin.)
On 4/29/26 10:31, Caleb Herbert via KCLUG wrote:
This is a test.
Btw, I might clarify that I am just reporting what I see on my end for informational purposes and am not campaigning for anything. A DKIM pass is indicative of a legitimate message but the inverse (DKIM fail indicating illegitimacy) is not true.
On 4/29/26 11:06, Shawn C. Powell via KCLUG wrote:
Caleb's message passed DKIM (2048 bit key).
Caleb's message used utf-8 base64 encoding.
Chris' message used us-ascii 7-bit encoding. Seems like I remember 7-bit/ascii can be problematic for DKIM signatures when messages pass through multiple layers like amavis, spam assassin, postfix, etc. But I thought I remembered SPF checks in headers too so there's that. :) (It may have been spam assassin.)
On 4/29/26 10:31, Caleb Herbert via KCLUG wrote:
This is a test.
KCLUG mailing list -- kclug@kclug.org To unsubscribe send an email to kclug-leave@kclug.org https://kclug.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/kclug.kclug.org/
-
Caleb Herbert -
Chris Bier -
Shawn C. Powell