Inneresting. I really did send that email in mid-March, and it really did finally arrive today. Wonder where it's been for 3 months. -Jared
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 12:07, Jared wrote:
Inneresting. I really did send that email in mid-March, and it really did finally arrive today.
Wonder where it's been for 3 months.
Received: from mail.datacaptech.com (datacaptech.com [66.55.54.114]) by kclug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C32170390B for <kclug@kclug.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:59:49 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00: -4.901 X-Spam-Level: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.1.254]) (authenticated user jsmith@datacaptech.com) by mail.datacaptech.com (Kerio MailServer 6.0.4) for kclug@kclug.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:53:49 -0600 So it looks like its been festering in an output que for 3 months on datacaptech.com's email server.
Jared wrote:
Inneresting. I really did send that email in mid-March, and it really did finally arrive today.
Wonder where it's been for 3 months.
On mail.datacaptech.com, apparently: Received: from mail.datacaptech.com (datacaptech.com [66.55.54.114]) by kclug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C32170390B for <kclug@kclug.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:59:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.1.254]) (authenticated user jsmith@datacaptech.com) by mail.datacaptech.com (Kerio MailServer 6.0.4) for kclug@kclug.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:53:49 -0600
participants (3)
-
Gerald Combs -
Jared -
Jason Clinton