I appreciate this, but one of the primary jobs of any system administrator is to make sure the infrastructure can be easily maintained by a successor.  I'm simply not convinced that Gentoo can deliver this.

If there is an SSH vulnerability for example, Red Hat will notify me and I can test the patch internally.  Via a very simple series of commands I can deploy this regression tested patch across my network.  While I can imagine my part of the puzzle being similar in difficulty to Gentoo, I fail to see how Gentoo could possibly have the resources to internally test and vet the changes before making them available.  Red Hat can.  Novell can.

Distributions like Gentoo simply aren't tested enough for businesses to rely on.  I'm sure that there are plenty of anecdotal cases such as yours where a competent sysadmin was able to make all of it work, and work well.  But most businesses can't always count on having really good sysadmins, or can't devote their sysadmin time to maintaining something unique.  There is a distinct value in having a tried, true, dependable vendor that makes tested, reliable products.

I'm sorry, but Gentoo is not appropriate for business.  There is almost nothing about the distribution that is business-friendly - in fact I'd argue that it is in almost every way the exact opposite of what a business would want.  That's not a bad thing, Gentoo's a hobbyist OS.  Conversely, I wouldn't recommend RHEL for home users, as it's not meant for hobbyists or home desktops.  Yes, RHEL has a webbrowser and can play some games, but that doesn't mean it's good for grandma.  For the same reason just because Gentoo can run Apache and PostgreSQL doesn't mean it should be used on a production server.

Jeffrey.

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 4:50 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com> wrote:

This list does not include "vendor support."  The client for whom I
made that call takes great
pride in the depth and breadth of their system administration skills.

I was surprised by my finding, as I am a fan of Debian, but setting up
and maintaining in-house ebuilds
happens to take fewer keystrokes than setting up and maintaining
custom debs, especially when
it comes to selecting from available updates.

I do not know if the client for whom I made the
recommendation has followed it or not.  I am curious, I would
appreciate it if anyone on this
list who still works there could give me an update on the progress of
that project.



--

"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." -- Thomas Paine