From: Jeremy Fowler (jfowler@westrope.com)
Date: 03/13/03


From: "Jeremy Fowler" <jfowler@westrope.com>
Subject: RE: Unexplained Segmentation Faults
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:11:16 -0600
Message-ID: <MFEGKJBMPCLPMMMBAACNCEPJPGAA.jfowler@westrope.com>

Huh? I think you need to check your math there bub. ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net
> [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of James Colannino
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:32 PM
> To: kclug@kclug.org
> Subject: Re: Unexplained Segmentation Faults
>
>
> Nope. In fact, there's barely more than 2GB total on the entire system,
> and /var, as well as all my other partitions except /boot are on the
> same root partition, so it has about 10 or 11 GB free.
>
> James
>
> Christopher A. Bier wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Is the partition that /var is on full or almost full?
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 13:53, James Colannino wrote:
> > Hey everyone. I've had some problems with an old machine of mine for a
> >
> >>while. I have a P200 MMX running Slackware 8.1 that's worked very
> >
> > well
> >
> >>so far. The BIOS is able to recognize all 13GB of my HD which I've
> >>found to be quite rare with such an old machine, and it seemed for a
> >>while to be pretty stable.
> >>
> >>However, everytime I try to run "updatedb" so that I can locate files,
> >>it works for a few minutes and then always without fail will give me a
> >>segmentation fault. Then, if I've attempted that command, everytime I
> >>halt or restart the system, it'll give me a segmentation fault as it's
> >>unmounting all remote filesystems (I don't actually have any -- I'm
> >>planning on removing all references to nfs from the system.) If I
> >>haven't tried to updatedb, it halts and restarts without any problems.
> >>
> >>After I've gotten one segmentation fault from running the command
> >>"updatedb," from now on, until I reboot the system, it doesn't even
> >
> > work
> >
> >>the Hard Drive at all before I get the same error, this time saying
> >>something about a NULL Pointer.
> >>
> >>This is really frustrating me. I'm pretty sure from other
> >
> > observations
> >
> >>I've made that excessive writing (and/or reading -- not sure) to the
> >>disk is what's producing these errors.
> >>
> >>Now for my question. Do you think maybe the processor is bad, or do
> >
> > you
> >
> >>think maybe there's something wrong with the IDE controllers? This is
> >>kind of an odd problem. I'm certain that the disk is good. I've had
> >>very good luck with it thus far (of course I'll probably plunk it in
> >>another system and give it a good diagnostical checkup to make sure.)
> >
> > I
> >
> >>tried running the processor at 166 Mhz as opposed to 200 Mhz in a vain
> >>attempt to see if maybe for some reason the CPU was overheating, but
> >>that I see is most likely not the problem. I did over clock it once
> >
> > to
> >
> >>233 Mhz, and had the segmentation faults start occuring (this was
> >
> > before
> >
> >>I'd used the system pretty much at all though,) so I originally
> >
> > thought
> >
> >>that maybe I over heated the CPU and thus set it back to 200. It
> >
> > seemed
> >
> >>to work alright, but it's still producing these errors (only when I
> >
> > use
> >
> >>the disk a great deal though.) Very strange. Any ideas?
> >>
> >>James
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQE+cPPmE5xXU3JS1mQRAmXSAKCFtB8TBHqVsuSeNkPEYrQtp37ingCgpdt7
> > 1HKWo2E+i9zmjtukCOYu4yY=
> > =oPpO
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> The New Penguin Times: A New Linux Online Magazine
> http://www.newpenguintimes.com
>
>
>
>