Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20020125151220.00cb65c0@mail.dslonramp.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 15:02:41 -0600 From: Bradley Miller <bradmiller@dslonramp.com> Subject: Re: From Slashdot: Comcast goes after NAT users
At 02:40 PM 1/25/02 -0600, you wrote:
> The idea of charging
>for network utilization is archaic.
Ok -- let's think about that for a second. Doesn't that point mean then
that spam should be permitted? It's using a "renewable resource" so who
cares if it goes out to users? If someone pays to have a TI and they want
to send emails to 10 gazillion people . . . why would we limit what they
send out on that TI? Who are service providers to care what comes in on a
user's email account . . . or web browswer? Pop-up ads are just as
intrusive and many times suck down more bandwidth then spam mails . . . but
people aren't nearly as hostile about them as spam.
Interesting food for thought eh?
-- Bradley Miller
--------------11B072214CDC104FDFF1E772