Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2000 17:28:41 -0600 Subject: Fw: Re: Tux Image Revisited Message-ID: <20001209.172659.-3794409.0.dmonster@juno.com> From: "Monty J. Harder" <dmonster@juno.com>
On Fri, 08 Dec 2000 11:33:21 -0600 Gene and Amy Dascher
<gdascher@home.com> writes:
> OK, try this one on for size:
>
> http://members.home.com/gdascher/images/tux_2.jpg
Now, we're getting there. The glow off the KC make it look like it's
just been pulled from the fire. BTW, I like the interlocked arrangement,
familar from the Chiefs, Royals, and for that matter Kangaroos, better
than the unlinked "K C". Now, if we could just get a bit of thickness to
the hat (looks a bit too artifical, like it's made out of paper), and
that texture on the feet, we'd have a damn fine logo that any LUG would
envy!
---
Oh. I just looked at a reduced image. More difficult to make out the
iron. Probably ought to thicken it up some. I know that makes the iron
look too big, but that's part of what makes it cute: little Tux looks
like he can barely hold up this oversized branding iron. Metaphor for
the big job (big iron? like the IBM 390 thing? <g>) that "The little OS
that could" has before it.
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
--------------62B1957D0EDDC09947DECBED
