Message-ID: <1141.206.107.226.14.1049739866.squirrel@www.kclinux.net> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:23:30 -0500 Subject: RE: RR / Cable Broadband pricing From: <admin@kclinux.net>
Time Warner just told me I'm not eligible to receive that package. South
KC area - East of Red Bridge & Holmes. (And no I'm not the computer garage
sale guy.)
Seth Dimbert said:
> I wasn't sure if I was going to weigh in on this TWC/Everest Issue or
> not, since opinions seem to be pretty strong. I thought it might be
> nice to stay out of a controversial thread for once.
>
> Alas.
>
> Since it was my remarks about my $15/month savings that started it off,
> I feel the need to clarify:
>
> It is TRUE that, about 6 months ago, following Everest's install in my
> neighborhood, TWC came door-to-door offering special "Customer
> Retention" pricing. In my opinion, that is entirely within their
> rights. In case you'd like to disagree, go right ahead; I won't argue.
> But note that this has been settled pretty clearly in the courts thanks
> to Victoria's Secret, who put different prices in their catalogs based
> on Zip Code.
>
> It is also TRUE that the $59.99/month plan I described for a Road
> Runner & Digital Cable package is an offer TWC makes to EVERYONE. It is
> NOT part of their "Customer Retention" pricing. If you don't believe
> me, call them and ask. (Do not bother to check their website as it is
> not mentioned there. I believe it is, as I mentioned before, called
> "Digital Tier I."
>
> Note that I do not work for either Everest or TWC (or Victoria's
> Secret, for that matter) and that everything in this e-mail is true as
> of today, to the best of my knowledge. But, I (obviously) do not speak
> in any official way for anyone but myself.
>
> -SD
>
>
>