From: "Mick Ohrberg" <mick@ohrberg.org> Subject: RE: Speed test (results from first test) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:43:18 -0600 Message-ID: <MCEDLOCIBACLPPDNLLEMGECCCDAA.mick@ohrberg.org>
It's very interesting to note that the ASSIGNMENT and NEURAL NET items are
lower than a P90. Anyone have any ideas why?
/Mick
| -----Original Message-----
| From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net
| [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Jason
| Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:26 PM
| To: Mick Ohrberg; kclug@kclug.org
| Subject: Re: Speed test (results from first test)
|
|
| Here is my test on a Dual PII 450 - 512KB cache , (I know it is a single
| thread test) if ram matters I have 1GB running Slackware 8.1
|
|
| bash-2.05a# ./nbench
|
| BYTEmark* Native Mode Benchmark ver. 2 (10/95)
| Index-split by Andrew D. Balsa (11/97)
| Linux/Unix* port by Uwe F. Mayer (12/96,11/97)
|
| TEST : Iterations/sec. : Old Index : New Index
| : : Pentium 90* : AMD K6/233*
| --------------------:------------------:-------------:------------
| NUMERIC SORT : 195.66 : 5.02 : 1.65
| STRING SORT : 18.139 : 8.10 : 1.25
| BITFIELD : 5.8663e+07 : 10.06 : 2.10
| FP EMULATION : 11.927 : 5.72 : 1.32
| FOURIER : 3646.3 : 4.15 : 2.33
| ASSIGNMENT : 2.5679 : 9.77 : 2.53
| IDEA : 412.37 : 6.31 : 1.87
| HUFFMAN : 197.34 : 5.47 : 1.75
| NEURAL NET : 3.876 : 6.23 : 2.62
| LU DECOMPOSITION : 113.53 : 5.88 : 4.25
| ==========================ORIGINAL BYTEMARK
| RESULTS==========================
| INTEGER INDEX : 6.958
| FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 5.335
| Baseline (MSDOS*) : Pentium* 90, 256 KB L2-cache, Watcom* compiler 10.0
| ==============================LINUX DATA
| BELOW===============================
| C compiler : gcc version 2.7.2.3
| libc : libc.so.5.4.38
| MEMORY INDEX : 1.884
| INTEGER INDEX : 1.634
| FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
| Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache, gcc 2.7.2.3,
| libc-5.4.38
| * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
| bash-2.05a#
| bash-2.05a# FLOATING-POINT INDEX: 2.959
| bash: FLOATING-POINT: command not found
| bash-2.05a# Baseline (LINUX) : AMD K6/233*, 512 KB L2-cache,
| gcc 2.7.2.3,
| libc-5.4.38
| bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(LINUX)'
| bash-2.05a# * Trademarks are property of their respective holder.
|
|
| On Sunday 10 November 2002 8:02 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
| > I found something called nbench
| > (http://www.tux.org/~mayer/linux/bmark.html). You may want to give it a
| > whirl. Unfortunately, since it's a single-threaded test, your
| duals won't
| > do you much good. I haven't been able to find a multi-threading
| test yet.
| >
| > /Mick
| >
| > | -----Original Message-----
| > | From: owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net
| > | [mailto:owner-kclug@marauder.illiana.net]On Behalf Of Jason
| > | Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 6:42 PM
| > | To: Mick Ohrberg; kclug@kclug.org
| > | Subject: Re: Speed test (results from first test)
| > |
| > |
| > | What is this test? I have a dual PPro 200 and a Dual PII 450
| > |
| > |
| > | Jason
| > |
| > | On Sunday 10 November 2002 4:54 pm, Mick Ohrberg wrote:
| > | > Hm, it seems that (in this test), the SPARC was slowest.
| Keep in mind,
| > | > however, that the compiled code that gcc generates on the SPARC is
| >
| > 32-bit
| >
| > | > code (right?). Now on to find a multi-threading test! :)
| > | >
| > | > /Mick
| >
|
| --
| http://www.hailmaryfullofgrace.net
|
|
|