I think we can both completely agree on that. It would be nice if they could find a way to have a "smaller" product for small businesses that was in between. I find myself advocating RHEL on core servers, Fedora on everything else too often.<br>
<br>Jeffrey.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Arthur Pemberton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pemboa@gmail.com">pemboa@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><div class="Ih2E3d">
<br>
</div>It's a fair opinion. And I agree with it overall, even the "taking<br>
dollars away from Red Hat" as that is more or less a fact.<br>
<br>
However RedHat's pricing, while fair, is beyond the reach of some. It<br>
would be good to see them provide a cheaper version with less/lower<br>
priority support. Doing so would probably get them a piece of Centos'<br>
pie as well.<br>
<div><div></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br>-- <br><br>"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." -- Thomas Paine<br>