<div>But if Obama takes all our guns away how will we test bulletproof linux? ;)</div> <div> </div> <div><STRONG><FONT size=4>Bulletproof Linux: Fact or Fiction?</FONT></STRONG></div> <div><A href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3389291">http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3389291</A><BR></div> <div><BR><B><I>Adrian Griffis <adriang63@gmail.com></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">David, surely this is the wrong place for this thread<BR><BR>To all of you, I must say that I do not understand why this kind of<BR>contempt for those who have signed up for this list is so common and<BR>so well tolerated. These off-topic posts are essentially spam. They<BR>are not what people were signing up for when they joined this list.<BR>The fact that these topics are important is beside the point. If<BR>these topics are important, surely they deserve their own
mailing<BR>lists, and surely we should let our audience make their own decisions<BR>about whether or not to join those other lists. Once an audience has<BR>made their choices about what topics to participate in, it is<BR>difficult for me to understand why so many on this list won't respect<BR>those decisions. As much as many of you may see importance in some of<BR>these topics, is it really up to you to overrule the decisions that<BR>others have made and impose these discussions on them?<BR><BR>Adrian<BR><BR>On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM, David Nicol <DAVIDNICOL@GMAIL.COM>wrote:<BR>> http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/nra_targets_obama.html<BR>><BR>> That the NRA is a tool of "The Establishment" is not news, right? Is<BR>> it a correct assertion?<BR>> _______________________________________________<BR>> Kclug mailing list<BR>> Kclug@kclug.org<BR>>
http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug<BR>><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Kclug mailing list<BR>Kclug@kclug.org<BR>http://kclug.org/mailman/listinfo/kclug<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>