<div dir="ltr">I don't know about XFS-on-Linux, but I've used XFS on IRIX for ten years now and I've probably had a hundred unclean shutdowns. I've only once had data corruption, and that was recently when there was some kind of dirty power event that threw five disks and two controllers in my array.<br>
<br>Even then a simple xfs-repair fixed that problem. While my example is certainly anecdotal, folks may want to consider my assertion that XFS is certainly not fragile, at least not on IRIX.<br><br>Jeffrey.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Justin Dugger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jldugger@gmail.com">jldugger@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>Is this a recent change? Because for a very long time, the XFS FAQ<br>
basically said "if it hurts, don't do it" when it comes to unclean<br>
shutdowns. I've never heard XFS described as copy on write.<br><br></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><br>"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself." -- Thomas Paine<br>
</div>